|
Policy Guidance for Property Tax Reform |
|
|
|
Right-Sizing the 2% Cap |
|
If a 2% revenue cap is adopted, it belongs on the general fund levy -- not on levies that pay for costs that cities don't control. Tort liability, insurance costs and benefits obligations are outside of a city's control, but would quickly eat through a budget under a 2% cap on all levies. Insurance costs alone have increased ~20% annually since 2020.
For more on the impacts of the problem and policy solution, see the League's 2% Cap Guide.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Essential Operations and Equipment Bonding |
|
No local government entities should be utilizing bonding or indebtedness for salaries or benefits, and therefore the prohibition on this activity is a welcome codification of best practice. However, the current language is vague enough to cause concern that public safety equipment, infrastructure, and capital improvement projects would be prevented from being bonded by cities.
For more on the impacts of the problem and policy solution, see the League's Bonding Guide.
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Valuation |
|
Under current law, cities are discouraged from economic development because any increase in valuation — whether from revaluation or new growth — can negatively impact revenues under HF 718.
For more on the impacts of the problem and policy solution, see the League's New Valuation Guide.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Local Options Sales and Service Tax
|
|
Iowa’s funding of local government has historically relied too heavily on property taxes. Local governments agree that taxpayers need to be at the center of the property tax conversation. Adopting Division IX of SF 2472 allows for local government funding diversification only upon a vote of the taxpayers, and will allow cities to deliver even further property tax relief while preserving service delivery should a community vote for it.
For more on the impacts of the problem and policy solution, see the League's LOSST Guide. |
|
|